Re: Performance difference between Slon master and slave

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Matthew Lunnon <mlunnon(at)rwa-net(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance difference between Slon master and slave
Date: 2015-12-14 17:49:57
Message-ID: 566F0145.30707@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 12/14/15 11:16 AM, Matthew Lunnon wrote:
> Inspecting the execution plan shows that there are some differences, for
> example, the slave is using a HashAggregate when the master is simply
> grouping. There also seems to be a difference with the ordering of the
> sub plans.

Have you tried analyzing the tables on the slave?

Also, keep in mind that the first time you access rows on a Slony slave
after they're replicated Postgres will need to write hint bits out,
which will take some time. But that's clearly not the issue here.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pedro França 2015-12-14 18:53:45 Getting an optimal plan on the first execution of a pl/pgsql function
Previous Message Matthew Lunnon 2015-12-14 17:16:52 Performance difference between Slon master and slave