| From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Loggingt psql meta-commands |
| Date: | 2015-12-10 22:52:38 |
| Message-ID: | 566A0236.3010301@hogranch.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/10/2015 2:03 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
> So some aspect of this:
>
> https://www.stigviewer.com/stig/database_security_requirements_guide/
thats a rather insane bunch of requirements. Reads like a wish list by
academic security researchers.
for instance
https://www.stigviewer.com/stig/database_security_requirements_guide/2015-06-23/finding/V-58123
??!? The database server has no clue about the difference between an
"application that it supports" and a user directly querying. The PSQL
shell, or dbadmin, is an 'application that it supports'.
at this point, speaking purely as a interested outsider (I am in no way
representing hte PG Development Group), I'd guess PostgreSQL probably
doesn't meet 2/3rds of those 'findings'. I truly wonder if any
standard RDBMS supports all or even most of them?!?
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | oleg yusim | 2015-12-10 22:58:46 | Re: Loggingt psql meta-commands |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2015-12-10 22:45:39 | Re: Loggingt psql meta-commands |