From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: initdb when data/ folder has mount points |
Date: | 2018-02-22 00:47:16 |
Message-ID: | 5668.1519260436@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
> On 02/21/2018 06:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
>>> Apparently, initdb assumes that data/ is one big mount point. However, we
>>> have four mount points:
>>> /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/backup
>>> /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/base
>>> /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/pg_log
>>> /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/pg_xlog
>> Don't do that.
> I'm replicating the structure in our existing systems. Is there an (up to
> date) Best Practices document for these kinds of issues?
Well, initdb has never allowed a non-empty target (at least not in this
century). So your existing setup must have been achieved by manual
hacking post-initdb, which you could certainly do again if you're dead
set on that layout. I remain of the opinion that it's not a good
design, though.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lucas Fairchild-Madar | 2018-02-22 00:53:15 | Re: Understanding query planner cpu usage |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2018-02-22 00:18:15 | Re: initdb when data/ folder has mount points |