From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Include ppc64le build type for back branches |
Date: | 2015-12-08 17:24:09 |
Message-ID: | 56671239.2090408@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/08/2015 10:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> So, config.guess should be changed to include the build type for ppc64le
>> like it is in 9.4+ branches.
> So far as I can tell from a quick troll of the git history, we have never
> ever updated config.guess/config.sub in released branches. I'm a bit
> hesitant to do it in this case either: it would amount to retroactively
> adding support for a platform, which sure sounds like a new feature.
>
> My vote would be to adjust your buildfarm critter to only try to build
> 9.4 and up.
>
>
Or put what he said works in his critter's build-farm.conf in the
config_opts section, something like:
--build=powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-08 17:31:25 | Weird portability issue in TestLib.pm's slurp_file |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-08 17:18:05 | Re: Combining Aggregates |