| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: "stored procedures" |
| Date: | 2011-04-22 00:17:50 |
| Message-ID: | 5665.1303431470@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On 4/21/11 3:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe we should think about the SP controlling a second backend (or even
>> multiple backends?) that's executing the "transactional" operations.
>> dblink on steroids, as it were.
> This is how people are doing this now (using dblink I mean).
Right, and it works. But it's notationally painful, management of the
connection information poses security issues, etc etc. Perhaps those
sorts of things could be addressed, though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-04-22 01:00:10 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-04-21 23:27:47 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |