| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs? |
| Date: | 2019-02-12 16:28:07 |
| Message-ID: | 56637365-B4DB-4EE5-AEFC-195B24D68D0C@pgadmin.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 12 Feb 2019, at 16:00, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> I was just perusing our PDF docs for the first time in ages and
> realized that of the 3,400+ pages of docs there's about 1,000 pages of
> release notes in it.... That seems like a bit overkill.
>
> I love having the old release notes online but perhaps they can be
> somewhere other than the main docs? We could limit the current docs to
> including the release notes for just the supported versions -- after
> all you can always get the old release notes in the old docs
> themselves
+1. It does seem excessive.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2019-02-12 16:45:49 | Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs? |
| Previous Message | Hugh Ranalli | 2019-02-12 16:21:35 | Re: BUG #15548: Unaccent does not remove combining diacritical characters |