Re: PostgreSQL and Windows

From: "Yurgis Baykshtis" <ybaykshtis(at)aurigin(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostGreSQL mailing list" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Windows
Date: 2003-06-16 20:12:36
Message-ID: 56510AAEF435D240958D1CE8C6B1770AF198A3@mailc03.aurigin.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce, thank you for the information.

May I ask you one more question?
Will it be feasible to run the native Windows version of Postgres
in-process (that is in client's process)?

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Yurgis Baykshtis
Cc: PostGreSQL mailing list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows

Yurgis Baykshtis wrote:
>
> We have a similar question about upcoming Windows "native" release:
>
> Is it going to be multithreaded or one process per connection like on
> cygwin?

One connection per process. The only multithreaded Win32 is SRA's
commercial product.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania
19073

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-16 20:24:58 Re: PostgreSQL and Windows
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-16 20:05:55 Re: Domains and function arguments