From: | "Yurgis Baykshtis" <ybaykshtis(at)aurigin(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "PostGreSQL mailing list" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and Windows |
Date: | 2003-06-16 20:12:36 |
Message-ID: | 56510AAEF435D240958D1CE8C6B1770AF198A3@mailc03.aurigin.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce, thank you for the information.
May I ask you one more question?
Will it be feasible to run the native Windows version of Postgres
in-process (that is in client's process)?
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Yurgis Baykshtis
Cc: PostGreSQL mailing list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Windows
Yurgis Baykshtis wrote:
>
> We have a similar question about upcoming Windows "native" release:
>
> Is it going to be multithreaded or one process per connection like on
> cygwin?
One connection per process. The only multithreaded Win32 is SRA's
commercial product.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania
19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-16 20:24:58 | Re: PostgreSQL and Windows |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-16 20:05:55 | Re: Domains and function arguments |