Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data.

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data.
Date: 2015-11-19 00:05:49
Message-ID: 564D125D.70908@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/18/2015 01:51 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 01:38:47PM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> Alright, I was following you up to this. Seems to me deleted data would
>> represent stale/old data and would be less valuable.
>
> If the data that was deleted is sensitive, then the fact that you
> deleted it but that it didn't actually go away means you can be lulled
> into complacency about your vulnerability with respect to that data in
> a way that you're unlikely to be in respect of data you still have
> (only with new values). Lots of people forget about deleted data once
> it's deleted.

Yet another avenue I failed to see. Interesting discussion.

>
> Keep in mind that sometimes people delete data from a system because
> it's been archived somewhere else or something like that -- not all
> databases have the totality of all the relevant data in them, but can
> often represent just "current" data.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Richards 2015-11-19 00:31:15 What could cause CREATE TEMP... "could not read block" error?
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2015-11-19 00:03:41 Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data.