Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data.

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data.
Date: 2015-11-18 21:38:47
Message-ID: 564CEFE7.30702@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/18/2015 01:34 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:22:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's quite unclear to me what threat model such a behavior would add
>> useful protection against.
>
> If you had some sort of high-security database and deleted some data
> from it, it's important for the threat modeller to know whether the
> data is gone-as-in-overwritten or gone-as-in-marked-free. This is the
> same reason they want to know whether a deleted file is actually just
> unlinked on the disk.
>
> This doesn't mean one thing is better than another; just that, if
> you're trying to understand what data could possibly be exfiltrated,
> you need to know the state of all of it.
>
> For realistic cases, I expect that deleted data is usually more
> important than updated data. But a threat modeller needs to
> understand all these variables anyway.

Alright, I was following you up to this. Seems to me deleted data would
represent stale/old data and would be less valuable.
>
> A
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Nolan 2015-11-18 21:46:10 Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data.
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2015-11-18 21:34:01 Re: postgres zeroization of dead tuples ? i.e scrubbing dead tuples with sensitive data.