From: | Nikolay Shaplov <n(dot)shaplov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data |
Date: | 2015-11-17 18:10:33 |
Message-ID: | 564B6D99.1030403@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >> I still have an opinion that documentation should be more verbose, than
> >> your version, but I can accept your version.
> >
> > I am not sure that's necessary, pageinspect is for developers.
> >
> >> Who is going to add heap_page_item_attrs to your patch? me or you?
> >
> > I recall some parts of the code I still did not like much :) I'll grab
> > some room to have an extra look at it.
>
> I have added back heap_page_item_attrs the patch attached, fixing at
> the same time some typos found while looking again at the code. If you
> are fine with this version, let's have a committer look at it.
Everything seems to be ok. I've changed only one thing in your version
of the patch. I've renamed split_tuple_data to
tuple_data_split_internal, because when there are split_tuple_data and
tuple_data_split in the same file, nobody will guess what the difference
between these function and why are they named in such a strange way.
If it is ok, set proper status, and let commiter do his job :-)
--
Nikolay Shaplov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pageinspect_paque_v2_mod1.diff | text/x-patch | 26.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-17 18:19:08 | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-17 17:57:55 | Re: Minor comment improvement to create_foreignscan_plan |