| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Operator families vs. casts |
| Date: | 2011-05-24 14:10:34 |
| Message-ID: | 5647.1306246234@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> PostgreSQL 9.1 will implement ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE operations that use a
> binary coercion cast without rewriting the table or unrelated indexes. It
> will always rewrite any indexes and recheck any foreign key constraints that
> depend on a changing column. This is unnecessary for 100% of core binary
> coercion casts. In my original design[1], I planned to detect this by
> comparing the operator families of the old and would-be-new indexes. (This
> still yields some unnecessary rewrites; oid_ops and int4_ops are actually
> compatible, for example.)
No, they aren't: signed and unsigned comparisons do not yield the same
sort order. I think that example may destroy the rest of your argument.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-05-24 14:26:59 | Re: Operator families vs. casts |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-05-24 14:03:04 | Re: Reducing overhead of frequent table locks |