Re: Error when test on DBT2 Postgresql

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Tim Chou <timchou(dot)hit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error when test on DBT2 Postgresql
Date: 2015-11-09 15:54:31
Message-ID: 5640C1B7.1090509@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/08/2015 07:40 PM, Tim Chou wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Thank you all the time. I also realized that DBT2 has some bugs.
> Actually, I have sent an email to DBT2's mailing list. However, no one
> responded me.
> The latency of a txn is not high in my test. But the number of txns
> processed in one minute are not high.

Well I finally got something to run. Using dbt3 on an old 32bit machine
I got:

aklaver(at)panda:~> dbt3-run-workload -3 -a pgsql -f 1 -o /tmp/results
SCALE: 1
Using seed: 1109074613
Database is already started: /tmp/pgdata/postmaster.pid.
waiting for server to shut down..... done
server stopped
waiting for server to start.... done
server started
starting system statistics data collection
Mon Nov 9 07:46:17 PST 2015: Throughput Stream 1: Starting RF 1...
Throughput Stream 1: Elapsed time for Refresh Stream 1: 18 seconds
Mon Nov 9 07:46:38 PST 2015: Throughput Stream 1: Starting RF 2...
Throughput Steam 1: Elapsed time for RF 2: 3 seconds
/usr/local/bin/dbt3-throughput-test: line 108: 7337 Terminated
dbt3-$DATABASE-dbstat ${OUTPUT_DIR}
waiting for server to shut down..... done
server stopped
Elapsed time for performance test: 72 seconds
waiting for server to start...... done
server started
Getting system configuration...
Getting query times...
waiting for server to shut down.... done
server stopped
Post processing query results...
throughput = 1189.29
Done!

Not sure what 'throughput = 1189.29' actually means.

>
> Thank you.
>
> Best.
> Tim
>
> 2015-11-08 22:21 GMT-05:00 Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>:
>
> On 11/08/2015 04:50 PM, Tim Chou wrote:
>
> Really CCing list this time.
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I use git to clone the repository (git clone
> http://git.code.sf.net/p/osdldbt/dbt2 osdldbt-dbt2).
> DBT2's website I used is
> http://sourceforge.net/p/osdldbt/dbt2/ci/master/tree
>
> I said my performance is very low because I read some papers and
> their
> performance can exceed one thousand of transactions per second.
> I don't
> want to compare with other databases, but I believe that my
> performance
> is too low because only 100+ transactions can be processed.
>
> I also try to change the data dir to a ram disk. However, the
> performance keeps similar.
>
> Which version of DBT2 and PostgreSQL do you use to test the
> performance?
>
>
> I have not actually used DBT2. With the information you provided I
> downloaded it and tried to get it to run here. So far, ultimately
> unsuccessful using DBT2 or DBT3. I have gotten as far as the load
> test(loading the data) but then it fails for one reason or another.
> This is against 9.4. Going to take a break, maybe someone with more
> experience using DBT can make suggestions to you.
>
>
> If I have some wrong understandings, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> 2015-11-08 17:20 GMT-05:00 Adrian Klaver
> <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>>:
>
>
> On 11/08/2015 01:55 PM, Tim Chou wrote:
>
> CCing list.
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> The version o Postgres is 9.4.5
> I download the DBT2 from their sourceforge website.
>
>
> What site would that be?:
>
> When I go here:
>
> http://osdldbt.sourceforge.net/
>
> all the tests up to dbt4 download the same tarball which is
> for dbt1
> and is from 2003.
>
> When I go here:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/osdldbt/files/
>
> the latest version is given as:
>
> dbt3-1.10.tar.bz2
>
>
> I follow the README file to run the test. (First,
> create and
> load data.
> Second, run dbt2-run-workload).
>
>
> In the README for the above I have:
>
> "Since this kit is derived from a TPC benchmark
> specification, TPC
> Policy on
> fair-use must be observed:
>
>
> http://www.tpc.org/information/about/documentation/TPC_Policies_v5.13.htm#_Toc124863463
>
> See the QuickStart for a brief introduction on using the kit.
> "
>
> So you will need to provide exact information as what dbt
> you are
> using and where it is coming from.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> 2015-11-08 9:45 GMT-05:00 Adrian Klaver
> <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
>
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>>>:
>
>
> On 11/07/2015 11:27 PM, Tim Chou wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> When I test the DBT2 with a large number of
> connections, I
> always get
> the error:
>
> Error in read.table(file = file, header =
> header, sep =
> sep, quote =
> quote, :
> no lines available in input
> Calls: read.csv -> read.table
>
> I have tracked the file and see the reason is
> there are no
> "TERMINATED"
> in mix.log.
> However, in my observation, driver and client
> do not close
> elegantly so
> they cannot quit with sprintf with the
> "TERMINATED"
> message (These
> threads are closed by killall command).
>
> 1. How can I solve the problem? (I have
> checked the
> bash script
> and c
> code. I don't know why each thread cannot exit
> from the
> main
> loop after
> the predefined time. It should exit the main
> loop at
> time xxxx,
> which is
> a pre-computed value, according to the code.)
>
> 2. I want to know if my performance is too low.
> No matter how I change the parameters, like
> creating
> RAM disk,
> improving
> the connection number, I always get the
> similar results.
> Here is one of my test results:
> Hardware: 4-core, 16GB of memory, two disks,
> and 1Gb
> ethernet
> Parameters: 10 warehouses, 30 connections.
>
> Response Time (s)
> Transaction % Average : 90th %
> Total
> Rollbacks %
> ------------ ----- ---------------------
> -----------
> ---------------
> -----
> Delivery 3.00 0.012 : 0.018
> 7
> 0 0.00
> New Order 41.63 0.006 : 0.008
> 97
> 0 0.00
> Order Status 5.58 0.003 : 0.004
> 13
> 0
> 0.00
> Payment 47.64 0.003 : 0.004
> 111
> 0 0.00
> Stock Level 2.15 0.005 : 0.007
> 5
> 0 0.00
> ------------ ----- ---------------------
> -----------
> ---------------
> -----
> 118.78 new-order transactions per minute (NOTPM)
> 0.8 minute duration
> 0 total unknown errors
> 97.0 seconds(s) ramping up
>
> It seems only 2 txns/sec. Is that too low? How
> can I
> improve the
> performance?
>
> 3. How can I test the performance in
> distributed mode?
>
> Looking forward to your replies.
>
>
> What version of Postgres?
>
> Where did get the DBT2 test?
>
> How did you run the test?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patric Bechtel 2015-11-09 19:09:12 Re: can postgres run well on NFS mounted partitions?
Previous Message Roland van Laar 2015-11-09 13:38:47 Backup and Restore BDR databases