Re: Certification

From: "Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth" <gunnar(dot)bluth(at)pro-open(dot)de>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Certification
Date: 2015-11-03 14:56:04
Message-ID: 5638CB04.30502@pro-open.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 03.11.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Joshua Kramer:
> There is something I haven't seen in this discussion- a comparison
> of certification types. Julyanto commented, "1. There are many
> thousands of Question which is groups into same level of
> difficulties. (weight)"
>
> This is not always the case. The certifications that are really
> worth something- RedHat's RHCE and I believe some Cisco certs- do
> not base their certification on correct answers to questions.
>
> Here's what I've heard about RedHat. When you go to take the RHCE
> exam, they sit you in front of a computer with a real OS install.
> Then they tell you, "Something is broken with this system; also,
> Services A, B, and C need to be installed and configured properly.
> You need to fix all of the problems and install the services. You
> have 3 hours and you can use any resource at your disposal except
> for Internet. GO!" This type of exam is difficult or impossible
> to do a brain-dump for. They make the issues so complex that you
> really have to know your stuff *and be able to think and use that
> information* in order to pass.
>
> I think a Postgres certification should be like that- action based
> rather than recall based.

As far as I understood, what Michael initially suggested was such a
kind of "hands-on" certification, as the LF does it that way.

+1 for that btw (being one of the first RHCEs ;-).
- --
Gunnar "Nick" Bluth
RHCE/SCLA

Mobil +49 172 8853339
Email: gunnar(dot)bluth(at)pro-open(dot)de
_____________________________________________________________
In 1984 mainstream users were choosing VMS over UNIX.
Ten years later they are choosing Windows over UNIX.
What part of that message aren't you getting? - Tom Payne

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWOMsEAAoJEBAQrmsyiTOM3GYH/3Z4UeuJjahGQaB+zhmXTSpE
lA5XjEs5TlLFhdGGCYxzMGfeEcC/rzwzErwR7N4yszs78CxwNq7AvaPOcLN768lD
KpGvKkHJLKS0eoDDMq1op0UTLK7svvsoeVcLg/EGNhedCrQ7jlp1/jdshPEXJddl
qmQGSOuwTX34lUwNHRE3wT4DfwhXLPrdPtC40g8SIgSWq+7qUf9koMF8iTt7TXVI
Biu8PcvFu71bkqePs8xV8G+KoBjCJ/iDNL7F951+PHunfP2MnveGS0evNiqbxQF7
8lme6bu8JtxemECtIZOXvzx6EfTQEsRc19NFRajaKejsec1wlkGmk5nCReIpdsk=
=pprk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment Content-Type Size
0x3289338C.asc application/pgp-keys 1.7 KB
0x3289338C.asc.sig application/octet-stream 287 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sameer Kumar 2015-11-03 15:17:48 Re: Certification
Previous Message Joshua Kramer 2015-11-03 14:45:40 Re: Certification