From: | Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support |
Date: | 2015-10-21 10:57:50 |
Message-ID: | 56276FAE.7000805@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
21.10.2015 01:37, Jim Nasby пишет:
> On 10/20/15 9:00 AM, Artur Zakirov wrote:
>> Internal representation of the dictionary in the PostgreSQL doesn't
>> impose too strict limits on the number of affix rules. There are a
>> flagval array, which size must be increased from 256 to 65000.
>
> Is that per dictionary entry, fixed at 64k? That seems pretty excessive,
> if that's the case...
This is per dictionary only. flagval array is used for the all
dictionary. And it is not used for every dictionary word.
There are also flag field of AFFIX structure, wich size must be
increased from 8 bit to 16 bit. This structure is used for every affix
in affix file.
--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Taiki Kondo | 2015-10-21 11:07:03 | Re: [Proposal] Table partition + join pushdown |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-10-21 10:55:34 | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |