Re: Are there any major benefits to using point and not real data type

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are there any major benefits to using point and not real data type
Date: 2015-10-19 21:18:09
Message-ID: 56255E11.8000007@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/19/2015 11:33 AM, romeo407 wrote:
> I am using postgres 9.4 and am new to this but I have 2 columns right now
> latitudes & longitudes. I have them saved as a real column so they take up 4
> bits each 8 altogether. I see that point is used for latitudes and
> longitudes but it is a whopping 16 bits are there any benefits (Performance)
> of using point over real datatype for coordinates? I plan on using indexes
> on the column and do receive a lot of inserts .

32bit REAL values of latitude and longitude are not very precise, maybe
4 arcseconds of latitude and 30 arcseconds of longitude... thats on the
order of up to nearly a km of error.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Mead 2015-10-19 22:26:35 Re: [BUGS] postgresql table data control
Previous Message Ken Been 2015-10-19 19:50:37 Re: interperting type oid in C code