Re: *** QUESTION *** After successful 'BEGIN;' command -- why PGSQL_TRANSACTION_ACTIVE and not PGSQL_TRANSACTION_INTRANS?

From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: "Steve Petrie, P(dot)Eng(dot)" <apetrie(at)aspetrie(dot)net>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: rob stone <floriparob(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: *** QUESTION *** After successful 'BEGIN;' command -- why PGSQL_TRANSACTION_ACTIVE and not PGSQL_TRANSACTION_INTRANS?
Date: 2015-10-14 19:33:02
Message-ID: 561EADEE.6030500@archidevsys.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/10/15 22:52, Steve Petrie, P.Eng. wrote:
[...]
>
> BTW -- this PostgreSQL newbie (bye bye mysql) is getting a nice warm
> fuzzy feeling, about PostgreSQL and its amazingly helpful community :)
[...]

I can attempt to remedy your 'nice warm fuzzy feeling'! :-)

More seriously:
(1) why did you consider PostgreSQL?
(2) what made you change?
(3) for you, in your situation: how is the ease of use & functionality
of PostgreSQL compared to MySQL?

Probably best to start a new thread in pgsql-advocacy for your answers -
I'm sure many people would be interested in what you have to say!

Cheers,
Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Quiroga, Damian 2015-10-14 20:31:12 Not storing MD5 hashed passwords
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2015-10-14 19:24:41 Re: postgres function