Re: large object write performance

From: Bram Van Steenlandt <bram(at)diomedia(dot)be>
To: "Graeme B(dot) Bell" <graeme(dot)bell(at)nibio(dot)no>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org list" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: large object write performance
Date: 2015-10-08 11:33:22
Message-ID: 56165482.7030109@diomedia.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Op 08-10-15 om 13:21 schreef Graeme B. Bell:
>>> First the database was on a partition where compression was enabled, I changed it to an uncompressed one to see if it makes a difference thinking maybe the cpu couldn't handle the load.
>> It made little difference in my case.
>>
>> My regular gmirror partition seems faster:
>> dd bs=8k count=25600 if=/dev/zero of=./test
>> 25600+0 records in
>> 25600+0 records out
>> 209715200 bytes transferred in 1.513112 secs (138598612 bytes/sec)
>>
>> the zfs compressed partition also goes faster:
>> dd bs=8k count=25600 if=/dev/zero of=./test
>> 25600+0 records in
>> 25600+0 records out
>> 209715200 bytes transferred in 0.979065 secs (214199479 bytes/sec)
>> but this one didn't really go that fast in my test (maybe 10%)
>
> Please can you run iozone and look for low random write performance with small blocks? (4k)
> http://www.slashroot.in/linux-file-system-read-write-performance-test
Like this ?

gmirror (iozone -s 4 -a /dev/mirror/gm0s1e) = 806376 (faster drives)
zfs uncompressed (iozone -s 4 -a /datapool/data) = 650136
zfs compressed (iozone -s 4 -a /datapool/data) = 676345

> Also please can you CC to the list with your replies to my on-list emails?
>
> Graeme Bell
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Graeme B. Bell 2015-10-08 11:37:41 Re: large object write performance
Previous Message Graeme B. Bell 2015-10-08 11:21:50 Re: large object write performance