From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
Date: | 2015-10-06 19:06:50 |
Message-ID: | 56141BCA.3070703@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/06/2015 12:03 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 03:33:20PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On 10/06/2015 10:57 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>> On 10/06/2015 10:17 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>>> Speaking of which ... this project is rich in skilled users who are
>>>> involved in the community but don't code. Bug triage is exactly the
>>>> kind of thing very part-time community supporters can do, if we make it
>>>> easy for them to do.
>>>
>>> That is an understatement. There is a huge pool of non-hackers that can
>>> help contribute to this sort of thing.
>>
>> It was said, way back when, "adding Windows support will add a huge pool
>> of Windows-only developers". I'm not sure that the impact was really
>> all that big there. We have a few Windows-enabled people, but how many
>> of them are Windows-only?
>>
>> We similarly said, "moving the TODO list to the wiki will add a huge
>> pool of users that cannot edit the current CVS-only file". To date,
>> most of what has happened is that the old items have become stale and
>> Bruce continues to do 99% of the work of maintaining it.
>>
>> So I am dubious that people that currently do not contribute will
>> contribute in the future just because we change the system.
>
> Agreed, though that did work for the commitfest --- I almost never deal
> with those patches, for good and bad.
There isn't a huge pool, but then we don't need a huge pool. We need
like three people, and I think that's not unreasonable to expect.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-06 19:52:05 | Re: Obsolete use of volatile in walsender.c, walreceiver.c, walreceiverfuncs.c? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-10-06 19:03:25 | Re: bugs and bug tracking |