From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml |
Date: | 2015-10-05 03:20:32 |
Message-ID: | 5611EC80.2050207@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015/10/03 5:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
>> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
>>> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
>>> defined locally in 9.5. How about "unique constraints or exclusion
>>> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"? Attached is a
>>> patch for that.
>> Makes sense to me.
> Me, too. Committed.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-10-05 03:27:00 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-10-05 01:04:17 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |