Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml
Date: 2015-10-05 03:20:32
Message-ID: 5611EC80.2050207@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015/10/03 5:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
>> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
>>> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
>>> defined locally in 9.5. How about "unique constraints or exclusion
>>> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"? Attached is a
>>> patch for that.

>> Makes sense to me.

> Me, too. Committed.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-10-05 03:27:00 Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2015-10-05 01:04:17 Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers