Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Date: 2015-09-29 20:39:57
Message-ID: 560AF71C.4050601@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/29/2015 12:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> We could possibly add additional checks, like trying to verify that
> pg_control has the same inode number it used to. But I'm afraid that
> would add portability issues and false-positive hazards that would
> outweigh the value.

Not sure you remember the incident, but I think years ago that would
have saved me some heartache ;-)

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-29 20:46:57 Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2015-09-29 20:36:53 Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So!