From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Raphael Bauduin <raphael(at)be(dot)easynet(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: performance "tests" |
Date: | 2002-04-10 15:37:03 |
Message-ID: | 5607.1018453023@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Raphael Bauduin <raphael(at)be(dot)easynet(dot)net> writes:
> At some times, it seems to hang: it doesn't insert any rows for more
> than 10 seconds. At that time, the postmaster process takes 0%. Why is
> that?
At a guess, you're seeing the syncer daemon flushing a lot of dirty
kernel disk buffers out to disk, and thereby monopolizing disk I/O.
I haven't experimented too much with Linux, but on HPUX it's not
difficult for a sync() call to bring the system to its knees for many
seconds, if you've got application programs that have written a whole
lot of pages since the last sync.
> What's strange is that everything else hangs also! Would that be due
> to the CPU??
The CPU is free, but everything that wants to access disk is starved
for disk bandwidth ...
> ii postgresql 7.1.3-7 Object-relational SQL database, descended fr
If you're going to run tests on foreign-key performance, please use
7.2.*.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tariq Muhammad | 2002-04-10 15:49:06 | Please help |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-10 15:18:02 | Re: Timestamps and performances problems |