From: | Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)mail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
Date: | 2015-09-25 06:11:33 |
Message-ID: | 5604E595.8080502@mail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/14/2015 06:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Michael Paquier
>>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Feedback is of course welcome, but note that I am not seriously
>>>> expecting any until we get into 9.6 development cycle and I am adding
>>>> this patch to the next CF.
>>> I have moved this patch to CF 2015-09, as I have enough patches to
>>> take care of for now... Let's focus on Windows support and improvement
>>> of logging for TAP in the first round. That will be already a good
>>> step forward.
>> OK, attached is a new version of this patch, that I have largely
>> reworked to have more user-friendly routines for the tests. The number
>> of tests is still limited still it shows what this facility can do:
>> that's on purpose as it does not make much sense to code a complete
>> and complicated set of tests as long as the core routines are not
>> stable, hence let's focus on that first.
>> I have not done yet tests on Windows, I am expecting some tricks
>> needed for the archive and recovery commands generated for the tests.
> Attached is v3. I have tested and fixed the tests such as they can run
> on Windows. archive_command and restore_command are using Windows'
> copy when needed. There was also a bug with the use of a hot standby
> instead of a warm one, causing test 002 to fail.
> I am rather happy with the shape of this patch now, so feel free to review it...
> Regards,
Michael, I've ran these and it worked fine for me.
See attached patch with a couple of minor fixes.
Amir
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
20150925_recovery_regressions_amir_fixes.patch | text/x-patch | 1.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-09-25 06:29:43 | Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2015-09-25 05:28:09 | Re: Doubt in pgbench TPS number |