| From: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: moderation of pg advocacy? |
| Date: | 2015-09-24 22:59:47 |
| Message-ID: | 56048063.8000506@darrenduncan.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 2015-09-24 3:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Darren Duncan wrote:
>> Isn't this group moderated or have some kind of controls? Usually I never
>> see spam/scams on tech lists like this, but the last 2 posts were that way.
>
> It is. In fact, 3 emails were posted in between those two you mention
> that weren't distributed (and in other lists, many many more are quietly
> rejected every day). The trouble is that these two posts were made from
> addresses that had been previously subscribed to some lists and had been
> taken over by bots; so the messages weren't held for moderation. I
> removed the addresses from the register, so it shouldn't happen again
> from those two addresses. Of course, there are others :-(
Understood. And in practice, auto-moderating only messages from unsubscribed
people is the only really practical way to manage a list with low overhead. --
Darren Duncan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-09-26 21:21:01 | About page on .org site |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-24 22:55:19 | Re: moderation of pg advocacy? |