Re: moderation of pg advocacy?

From: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: moderation of pg advocacy?
Date: 2015-09-24 22:59:47
Message-ID: 56048063.8000506@darrenduncan.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 2015-09-24 3:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Darren Duncan wrote:
>> Isn't this group moderated or have some kind of controls? Usually I never
>> see spam/scams on tech lists like this, but the last 2 posts were that way.
>
> It is. In fact, 3 emails were posted in between those two you mention
> that weren't distributed (and in other lists, many many more are quietly
> rejected every day). The trouble is that these two posts were made from
> addresses that had been previously subscribed to some lists and had been
> taken over by bots; so the messages weren't held for moderation. I
> removed the addresses from the register, so it shouldn't happen again
> from those two addresses. Of course, there are others :-(

Understood. And in practice, auto-moderating only messages from unsubscribed
people is the only really practical way to manage a list with low overhead. --
Darren Duncan

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-09-26 21:21:01 About page on .org site
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-24 22:55:19 Re: moderation of pg advocacy?