Re: pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-committers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
Date: 2015-09-22 13:14:00
Message-ID: 56015418.2060405@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 09/22/2015 12:32 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
>
> - might not be the same as the database user he needs to connect as.
> + might not be the same as the database user that is to be connect as.
>
>
> It is not an improvement. I would like to see this change rolled back.
>
>
>

I agree this is awkward.

I would use "might not be the same as the database user they need to
connect as." Let's be consistent about the use of they/them/their/theirs
as indefinitely gendered singular pronouns.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoff Winkless 2015-09-22 13:25:33 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-09-22 13:09:32 Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-09-22 13:20:01 Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-09-22 13:09:32 Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation