Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics
Date: 2015-09-16 14:37:43
Message-ID: 55F97EB7.8080308@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/16/2015 10:25 AM, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> Likely from LWLOCK_STATS' own lwlock.c::print_lwlock_stats, which would
> make sense.
>

Version 3 attached, which ignores entries from MainLWLockArray[0].

Best regards,
Jesper

Attachment Content-Type Size
lwstats_v3.patch text/x-patch 4.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-09-16 14:50:40 Re: T_PrivGrantee is left in NodeTag
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-09-16 14:32:54 Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()