Re: pgbench progress with timestamp

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench progress with timestamp
Date: 2015-09-16 14:28:08
Message-ID: 55F97C78.1050000@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you, committed

Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>>> --progress-timestamp use Unix epoch timestamps in ms for progress
>>>
>>
>> A quibble, but it isn't in ms, it is in seconds. The digits after the decimal
>> point give a precision to the ms level, but they don't change the base unit.
>
> Yes. The issue is mostly to keep the description under 80 columns.
>
>> I would just leave the units out of the help description, as the progress
>> message itself includes the units.
>
> Here is a v3 with a shorten description and a better documentation.
>
>
>
>

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2015-09-16 14:31:47 Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals
Previous Message Jesper Pedersen 2015-09-16 14:25:52 Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics