From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics |
Date: | 2015-09-16 14:13:29 |
Message-ID: | 55F97909.3010101@redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/15/2015 03:51 PM, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
>> It
>> would be nice to get a better sense of how *long* we block on various
>> locks. It's hard to tell whether some other lock might be have fewer
>> blocking events but for a much longer average duration.
>>
>
I did a run with the attached patch, recording the time from
LWLockQueueSelf() until the lock is required.
Doing block_time / block_count basically only shows "main 0" -- its
called "unassigned:0"; it also shows up in the max exclusive report.
Where it is coming from is another question, since it shouldn't be in use.
Due to the overhead of gettimeofday() I think that _v1 is better to
consider.
Best regards,
Jesper
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
lwstats_v2.patch | text/x-patch | 5.4 KB |
lwstats_blocktime.svg | image/svg+xml | 40.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2015-09-16 14:25:52 | Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics |
Previous Message | Zhaomo Yang | 2015-09-16 14:09:20 | Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING |