Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Gradek <mike(at)busbud(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics
Date: 2015-09-04 08:13:47
Message-ID: 55E952BB.8020603@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> No. They're not broken in a fundamental way, it's just that certain
> search terms no longer find document words you might think they should
> match. Oleg and Teodor argued back at the beginning of the FTS stuff
> that this sort of thing wasn't critical, and I agree --- but we shouldn't
> change the mapping in minor releases.

Agree. And update for FTS index isn't a pg_upgrade task, because unaccent
dictinary is a filtering dictionary and subsequent dictionaries might change a
recognition of word. So, pg_upgrade without knowledge of FTS configuration can
not do update by correct way.

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2015-09-04 08:16:11 Re: GRANT USAGE ON SEQUENCE missing from psql command completion
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-09-04 07:25:35 Re: PQexec() hangs on OOM