Re: Supporting fallback RADIUS server(s)

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Supporting fallback RADIUS server(s)
Date: 2015-08-20 11:01:02
Message-ID: 55D5B36E.8010507@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/20/15 12:57 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I mean that you could write radius_server=foo or radius_servers=foo as well
> as radius_server=foo,bar and radius_servers=foo,bar. As long as you don't
> specify both radius_server and radius_servers, either one of them should
> accept either one server or multiple servers.

I think if we do it this way, I'd prefer if "radiusserver" was kept
fully backwards compatible. So either specify "radiusserver" or
"radius_servers", but only the second one accepts a list.

.m

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Ramsey 2015-08-20 12:21:15 Re: Extension upgrade and GUCs
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2015-08-20 10:57:31 Re: Supporting fallback RADIUS server(s)