| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning |
| Date: | 2015-08-20 09:10:20 |
| Message-ID: | 55D5997C.8040405@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-20 AM 05:10, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 08/19/2015 04:59 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I like the idea of a regular partitioning step because it is how you
>> design such tables - "lets use monthly partitions".
>>
>> This gives sanely terse syntax, rather than specifying pages and pages
>> of exact values in DDL....
>>
>> PARTITION BY RANGE ON (columns) INCREMENT BY (INTERVAL '1 month' )
>> START WITH value;
>
> Oh, I like that syntax!
>
> How would it work if there were multiple columns? Maybe we don't want
> to allow that for this form?
>
Yea, we could simply restrict it to the single column case, which does not
sound like a major restriction.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-08-20 09:17:31 | Re: Extension upgrade and GUCs |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-08-20 07:43:18 | Re: Declarative partitioning |