Re: TAP tests are badly named

On 08/14/2015 09:27 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 08/14/2015 03:32 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:17:40AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> here's what I propose.
>> This changes more than the tapcheck name and the suites it could
>> run. Would
>> you write up the changes you chose to include? That will help guide
>> review.
>>
>
> I don't think it changes anything other than what was discussed. The
> code is rearranged a little, and an incorrect piece of code setting
> $ENV{PERL5LIB} is fixed (in the case where it was previously empty it
> would have added a spurious ";" and possibly caused a warning as
> well). Instead of looking everywhere in the tree for /t directories,
> the new bincheck function only looks for them in src/bin. And the
> tests would die on the first failure, as we would also expect the
> checks run under "make" to do.
>
> The effect is to remove the target "tapcheck" for which there is no
> "make" equivalent, and replace it with the target "bincheck", which is
> the equivalent of "make -C src/bin installcheck", which happens to be
> what the buildfarm runs.
>
>

I've just noticed a small error in the patch. Revised version attached.

cheers

andrew