From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: First-class Polymorphic joins? |
Date: | 2015-08-14 00:49:36 |
Message-ID: | 55CD3B20.6040502@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 08/13/2015 05:23 PM, Guyren Howe wrote:
> It surprises me that no SQL database to my knowledge has polymorphic joins as a first-class feature.
>
> A polymorphic join is where a fk contains not just an id but an indicator of which table it refers to.
I am pretty sure it already does that:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/interactive/sql-createtable.html
REFERENCES reftable [ ( refcolumn ) ]
So you could have a "tags" table, that can attach tags to any of a
variety of other tables. Rails handles this by including the table name
as a string.
>
> This seems a reasonable thing to want to do, and it seems that the database could handle it by combining the fields from the target tables in the result.
>
> I also think migrations ought to be a first-class feature…
So is this the push the ORM into the database day?
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2015-08-14 00:58:29 | Re: Foreign Keys as first class citizens at design time? |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2015-08-14 00:47:59 | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |