From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | twoflower <standa(dot)kurik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SELECT blocks UPDATE |
Date: | 2015-08-13 21:20:02 |
Message-ID: | 55CD0A02.3000202@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 08/13/2015 02:14 PM, twoflower wrote:
> Further observation: Now I managed to get rid of the blocking. I am not sure
> if you are familiar with the NHibernate ORM, but it has a concept of a
> stateful and stateless sessions. Session holds a connection to the database
> and transaction is created on a particular session. In this case, 'begin
> transaction' and the SELECT statement was executed in the context of the
> stateful session, while the UPDATE was executed on a stateless session. I am
> not sure how this situation manifests on Postgres but since the 'blocked'
> and 'blocking' lock apparently belong to the same transaction, it does not
> look like it should matter, except it does.
I would crank up the Postgres logging:
At least set log_statement to all, to see what is actually being sent to
the server from the ORM during the above.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/SELECT-blocks-UPDATE-tp5862040p5862097.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-13 23:58:06 | Re: SELECT blocks UPDATE |
Previous Message | twoflower | 2015-08-13 21:14:44 | Re: SELECT blocks UPDATE |