Re: Asynchronous execution on FDW

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous execution on FDW
Date: 2015-08-10 07:23:23
Message-ID: 55C8516B.10509@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've marked this as rejected in the commitfest, because others are
working on a more general solution with parallel workers. That's still
work-in-progress, and it's not certain if it's going to make it into
9.6, but if it does it will largely render this obsolete. We can revisit
this patch later in the release cycle, if the parallel scan patch hasn't
solved the same use case by then.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-08-10 07:34:34 Commitfest remaining "Needs Review" items
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-08-10 07:11:17 Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context