| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
| Date: | 2015-08-05 17:58:00 |
| Message-ID: | 55C24EA8.2050901@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/05/2015 10:46 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 1. Add the functions as a builtins.
> This is what the current patch does. Simon seems to prefer this,
> because he wants the function to be always available in production;
> but I don't like this option because adding functions as builtins
> makes it impossible to move later to extensions.
> Bruce doesn't like this option either.
Why would we want to move them later to extensions? Do you anticipate
not needing them in the future? If we don't need them in the future,
why would they continue to exist at all?
I'm really not getting this.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-08-05 17:59:42 | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-08-05 17:46:29 | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |