Re: Autonomous Transaction is back

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Autonomous Transaction is back
Date: 2015-07-23 19:58:41
Message-ID: 55B14771.7040902@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/23/2015 12:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> That's a problem, but I think it is rather unfair to say that it has
> anything to do with autonomous transactions. "Run a procedure without
> needing to hold a snapshot" is a completely separate feature request
> from "allow autonomous transactions", and it's probably neither easy
> nor uncontroversial.

That's more-or-less a summary of what I just posted.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dickson S. Guedes 2015-07-23 20:05:50 Re: raw output from copy
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-07-23 19:57:56 Re: Restore-reliability mode