| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
| Date: | 2015-07-17 04:26:55 |
| Message-ID: | 55A8840F.7030307@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> it is one possible solution too
>
> multiple -c option has advantage of simple evaluation of backslash
> statements .. -c "\l" -c "\dt" - but this advantage is not high important.
Or just properly understand the ; ?
-c "select * from foo; update bar set baz = 'bing'; vacuum bar;"
JD
>
> Pavel
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Dinesh
> manojadinesh.blogspot.com <http://manojadinesh.blogspot.com>
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-07-17 04:36:40 | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2015-07-17 03:52:51 | Re: Memory Accounting v11 |