| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Memory Accounting v11 |
| Date: | 2015-07-16 00:27:01 |
| Message-ID: | 55A6FA55.2080702@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 07/15/2015 07:07 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:59 +0530, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
>>
>> I think a heuristic would be more suited here and ignoring memory
>> consumption for internal types means that we are not making the
>> memory accounting useful for a set of usecases.
>>
> OK, I will drop this patch and proceed with the HashAgg patch, with
> a heuristic for internal types.
Could someone briefly explain what heuristics are we talking about?
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2015-07-16 01:21:49 | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-07-16 00:25:09 | Re: Memory Accounting v11 |