Re: Fix to expose a GUC variable, Log_disconnections, to outside of postgres.c

From: Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp>
To: hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix to expose a GUC variable, Log_disconnections, to outside of postgres.c
Date: 2015-07-09 06:54:21
Message-ID: 559E1A9D.1070802@uptime.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015/07/09 15:30, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 07:19 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
>>
>> On 2015/07/09 13:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp> writes:
>>>> I just found that Log_disconnections value has not been
>>>> exposed to outside of postgres.c.
>>>> Despite that, Log_connections has already been exposed.
>>>
>>> Why would an external module need to touch either one?
>>
>> To check settings of GUC variables from a shared preload
>> library.
>>
>> For example, I'd like to print "WARNING ...." in _PG_init()
>> when some GUC variable is disabled on postmaster startup.
>
> I still have a hard time seeing why an extension would be interested in
> Log_disconnections. But hey, extensions do strange things..

Definitely. :)

> You could use GetConfigOption(). I'm not necessarily opposed to exposing
> Log_disconnections, but with GetConfigOption() it will work with earlier
> versions too.

That's it! This is what I'm looking for. Thanks a lot. :)

Regards,
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2015-07-09 07:36:04 Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2015-07-09 06:37:58 Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans