On 07/03/2015 01:20 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Is there a way to determine the operator that resulted in calling the
> operator function? I thought fcinfo->flinfo->fn_expr might get set to
> the OpExpr, but seems it can be a FuncExpr even when called via an
> operator...
Don't think there is. Why do you need to know?
- Heikki