Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported
Date: 2018-05-02 16:09:06
Message-ID: 5594e1d6-a527-3ee5-d4a6-bc60c808aa4f@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/2/18 02:26, Amit Langote wrote:
> You're right. I think that's what you were also saying on the other
> thread, in reply to which I directed you to this thread. I very clearly
> missed that BEFORE ROW triggers are still disallowed.

fixed

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-05-02 16:14:33 Re: Sort performance cliff with small work_mem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-05-02 15:48:29 Re: stats_ext test fails with -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE