Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2015-07-01 14:50:20
Message-ID: 5593FE2C.2080501@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/1/15 10:15 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> One approach to address this problem is to introduce something like unlogged
> system catalog. I'm not sure if that causes another big problem, though...

Yeah, like the data disappearing after a crash. ;-)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-07-01 14:51:49 Re: NULL passed as an argument to memcmp() in parse_func.c
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-07-01 14:47:52 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2