From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andy Erskine <andy(dot)erskine(at)jds(dot)net(dot)au>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming Questions and Sizing |
Date: | 2015-07-01 13:20:14 |
Message-ID: | 5593E90E.9080605@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 06/30/2015 09:14 PM, Andy Erskine wrote:
> I have db of 123GB Currently and this is streaming to a secondary DB
> which also shows a size of 123GB (Using pgAdmin)
>
> The db's both reside on a 250GB directorys and on the Master i'm using
> 60% of capacity which seems expected
> On the secondary i am using 88% of the disks capacity. I assume this is
> something to do with the WAL segments ? which is currently
> wal_keep_segments = 500
That is for the server sending the segments, so I would assume you are
getting this number from the master not the standby?
>
> If this is the issue how do i go about tuning this to what is required ?
>
> If i make the segments to small then a restore may end up with an un
> synchronised database right ?
>
> thanks.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2015-07-01 13:29:44 | Re: Streaming Questions and Sizing |
Previous Message | Urs G. Berner | 2015-07-01 12:51:37 | Re: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS install problem |