Re: SQLJSON

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQLJSON
Date: 2015-06-30 22:42:41
Message-ID: 55931B61.5080105@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 6/30/2015 3:30 PM, Vitalii Tymchyshyn wrote:
>
> I dont understand how users can "not realize they need another
> dependency" if their application is going to use Json.
> How they think they are going to use it without having it in classpath?
>
> Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
>

what about all of us who don't use JSON in our databases as it really is
a poor fit to the relational calculus ? if there are dependencies on
modules that aren't part of J2SE, we'll be rather annoyed.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

  • Re: SQLJSON at 2015-06-30 22:30:07 from Vitalii Tymchyshyn

Responses

  • Re: SQLJSON at 2015-06-30 23:14:21 from Álvaro Hernández Tortosa

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Hernández Tortosa 2015-06-30 23:14:21 Re: SQLJSON
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2015-06-30 22:38:21 Re: SQLJSON