Re: SQLJSON

From: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8Kdata(dot)com>
To: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Markus KARG <markus(at)headcrashing(dot)eu>
Cc: List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQLJSON
Date: 2015-06-30 17:25:04
Message-ID: 5592D0F0.1030705@8Kdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc


Thanks for asking for the double-check. No, indeed I'm still asking
to provide the class files for the API in the package. I feel that's the
right way, and I don't see it would create conflicts unless JSR353 would
create a new version, something which I believe extremely unlikely until
it merges with Java10 or JDBC5 comes out, point at which we would need
to change things anyway.

However, I don't want to insist more or suck more dev bandwitch,
that's my opinion and it's been stated more times than I wish, so I
would now leave the decision to the rest of you :)

Regards,

Alvaro

--
Álvaro Hernández Tortosa

-----------
8Kdata

On 30/06/15 18:49, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> ah. I meant to double-check with Álvaro if he is suggesting compile
> type dependency.
>
> If he means that we in fact are discussing the same thing, so no
> contradiction exists.
>
>> However, regarding POLA you say "compile dependency" which means you
>> suggest _not_ including javax.json into pgjdbc.jar
>>
>> Álvaro , Can you please tell us if "using compile type dependency for both
>> javax.json and RI" suits you?
>>
> Vladimir

In response to

  • Re: SQLJSON at 2015-06-30 16:49:18 from Vladimir Sitnikov

Responses

  • Re: SQLJSON at 2015-06-30 17:33:15 from Steven Schlansker

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steven Schlansker 2015-06-30 17:33:15 Re: SQLJSON
Previous Message Steven Schlansker 2015-06-30 17:09:16 Re: Adding new dependencies for in-core