| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | rmm(at)sqlisor(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres | 
| Date: | 2005-05-09 19:24:28 | 
| Message-ID: | 559.1115666668@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, actually.  If you look at the discussion, this is what killed the 2001 
> proposal; packages were proposed as orthagonal to schema which was not 
> acceptable.  
I think what actually killed that proposal was that it was not made
clear what it did that wouldn't be done as well (and in a more standard
fashion) by providing schemas.
What I read in this thread is that the only truly missing feature is
package variables (ie, session-local variables); is that an accurate
statement?  If so, it would seem simplest to add such a feature to
plpgsql and be done with it.  Several people already pointed out that
most of the other PLs support that feature today.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-09 19:30:40 | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres | 
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-09 18:50:19 | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres |