Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?
Date: 2015-06-24 15:57:53
Message-ID: 558AD381.9030004@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/23/15 2:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do not know at this point whether these behaviors are really the same
> bug or not, but I wonder whether it's time to consider back-patching the
> renegotiation fixes we did in 9.4.

If Red Hat fixes their bug, then PostgreSQL doesn't have any actual
problem anymore, does it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-06-24 16:01:51 Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-06-24 15:37:44 Re: git push hook to check for outdated timestamps