From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,"Todd A(dot) Cook" <tcook(at)blackducksoftware(dot)com>,Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14932: SELECT DISTINCT val FROM table gets stuck in an infinite loop |
Date: | 2018-01-29 18:14:53 |
Message-ID: | 55838447-FFA9-4E48-B204-8B37385704A8@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On January 29, 2018 10:11:38 AM PST, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2018-01-29 14:41:49 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> Do you think repeating the performance testing is necessary? Not
>sure
>>> when do you plan to push the changes, I may not have time for the
>tests
>>> until after FOSDEM.
>
>> Hm, it surely wouldn't hurt, but your previous result does give a lot
>of
>> confidence - there's not a lot of fundamental difference leaving one
>> more mitigation that should never reduce hashtable "quality" aside.
>So
>> I think going ahead with pushing and then benchmarking if possible,
>is
>> reasonable?
>
>Since the release wrap is this coming Monday, there's not really time
>to
>wait and do something after FOSDEM ...
I'm not sure what you're arguing for? I have measured the performance impacts, and am happy. That's why I do not want to wait till then. Doing additional benchmarks after commit can't hurt tho...
Andres
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Todd A. Cook | 2018-01-29 18:20:25 | Re: BUG #14932: SELECT DISTINCT val FROM table gets stuck in an infinite loop |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-29 18:11:38 | Re: BUG #14932: SELECT DISTINCT val FROM table gets stuck in an infinite loop |