Re: per feedback I received directly, pg_dump manpage patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: per feedback I received directly, pg_dump manpage patch
Date: 2015-06-14 01:50:30
Message-ID: 557CDDE6.2010808@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 5/28/15 3:27 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 05/28/2015 11:16 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 5/27/15 7:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> The man page does not clearly state that pg_dump will not dump things
>>> like users or roles. It does mention briefly in the notes section that
>>> pg_dumpall is needed for items that are set via SET but that isn't very
>>> clear on the other items.
>>
>> How about this patch?
>>
>
> I would change the word save to backup but other than that, looks good.

committed

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2015-06-14 09:49:04 Minor typo in rules.sgml
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-06-12 13:45:26 Re: pg_file_settings and catalog.sgml