From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Outstanding patches |
Date: | 2002-11-07 05:27:05 |
Message-ID: | 5578.1036646825@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I will be applying outstanding 7.4 patches on Friday:
> http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
> If anyone wants those rejected/modified, please let me know.
array upper/lower bound: missing doc updates, otherwise seems okay.
\pset pager always: I thought we had rejected that idea in favor of
making the whether-to-use-pager decision pay attention to width as
well as number of lines.
temp tables: difficult to comment on a message that does not include the
proposed patch.
CLUSTER ALL patch: I have a problem with this, specifically the fact
that it changes CLUSTER into a multi-transaction operation. That
renders CLUSTER non-rollbackable and not callable from functions.
After all the work we went to to make CLUSTER rollbackable, this seems
like a giant step backward.
CREATE SEQUENCE syntax changes: did we decide whether SQL99's notion of
a sequence is close enough to ours that migrating to their syntax would
be a good idea, and not just a source of confusion? I seem to recall
some doubts being voiced about this (by Peter?), and I'm not sure we
resolved them.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2002-11-07 05:27:31 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch. |
Previous Message | Steve Howe | 2002-11-07 05:20:19 | Re: Datetime type dropped from v7.3 ? |